LEEDSKALNIN.COM: MAGNETIC CURRENT RESEARCH

However, an explanation without proof of concept, despite the anomaly, will raise the eyebrow of even the most open minded. This site now features that proof of concept as a follow up to the original article on Keelynet and is the results of my ongoing research based on the writings of Edward Leedskalnin.

The Perpetual Motion Holder is primarily a teaching device but it has many functions including an electromagnet, this is easy enough to see; it is a generator—spin a magnet between the coils it will generate electricity; it’s a transformer; it demonstrates how permanent magnets are made, and is a holder of perpetual motion. The latter will be demonstrated now because it is important for you to see it defy some of the most basic laws of physics and a few, more sophisticated laws of modern EM theory. In the least, this experiment should generate questions for even the most well versed scholar of modern theory. Admittedly, the intention is in part is to show weakness in the current excepted views on the nature of the universe and to challenge J.J. Thomson's invention of the electron.

Leedskalnin never describes what the individual North and South pole magnet looks like, but before I do, let me first tell you about Rosalind Franklin. The results of her work are hailed as the greatest discovery in all of science--a discovery that is now considered the blueprint for all life on Earth. In 1951 Rosalind Franklin discovered the structure of DNA using a technique called x-ray crystallography or x-ray diffraction. Crystallographers shoot x-rays at atoms and they diffract onto a detector. Based on the diffraction pattern scientists can apply math and calculate the 3-D pattern of the most complex crystalline structures of matter. It is a very effective technique still used today. This is the technique used by Rosalind Franklin to discover that the structure of DNA is in the shape of an anti-parallel double-helix. This same diffraction pattern can be realized from the simple experiment highlighted in the video below demonstrating magnetic diffraction.

The same results can also be realized when hanging the magnets above the Perpetual Motion Holder as what is demonstrated in the enhanced Leedskalnin experiment above. The same conclusion can be drawn from this diffraction pattern. The same magnets that are running in the wire and in the coil are running in the Perpetual Motion Holder. Leedskalnin tells us that the individual magnets are moving at a very high rate of speed and are thrown off of the wire through centrifugal force and overcrowding, and this can also be demonstrated with the PMH. The PMH is a completed circuit that allows the individual magnets to assimilate into two currents and chase each other, orbiting in opposition to each other indefinitely--not going around one another, but through one another. If you put one kind of magnet in front of the other in an orbit they will never stop. This same diffraction pattern is demonstrated with the hanging magnets above the wire and above the PMH showing beyond a doubt that the current circulating in the PMH is the same that is in the wire and can only be 2 currents that, again, whirl forward—and they will always work to go forward—in a right hand twist. Both individual magnetic currents are in the shape of a helix. The N and S Pole individual magnets themselves are in the shape of a helix and they are identical; they are in fact interchangeable, with their only difference being dependant upon the direction to which they are moving forward relative to one another. Leedskalnin writes,

One becomes two. The essence of any true duality has no choice but to be a singularity. Even experienced Leedskalnin researchers may question my assertion that the individual North or South Pole magnet are one in the same and interchangeable with each other, but I can assure you this is consistent with every aspect of Leedskalnin’s writings. The more you read them, the more you experiment, the more this will come clear. It will be demonstrated in the video below, but believe it or not, Leedskalnin does actually tell us this on the first page of Magnetic Current. He states,

To make magnets with currents from batteries and dynamos with a single wire the metal will have to be put on the wire in such a way so that the magnets which are coming out of the wire will be running in the metal starting form the middle of the metal and run to the end and not from end to middle and across a they did the last time.

In a car battery the North Pole magnets run out of positive terminal and South Pole magnets run out of negative terminal. Both kinds of magnets are running, one kind of magnets against the other kind, and are running in the same right-hand screw fashion. By using the same whirling motion and running one kind of magnets against the other kind, they throw their own magnets form the wire in opposite directions. That is why if you put a magnet metal across the copper wire the one end is North Pole and the other end is South Pole.

Break five inches long piece of the fishing line [steel], put the middle of the wire across and on top of the copper wire, touch the battery, hold until the copper wire gets hot, dip the middle of the wire in iron filings, then you will see how long a magnet can be made with this equipment.

The coil is not necessary to make magnetic currents. Currents can be created with a single wire. The coil is necessary to increase the amount and strength of the currents.

In order for magnets to be attracted to one another they must be in front of one another and going toward each other. If these same magnets are in front of one another and going the same direction they are not attracted to one another because they would have the same polarity—after viewing the video below test it for yourself by putting two right hand spirals on a wooden rod. Move the one in the rear forward until it hits the one in front of it. Turn it slowly while moving forward. They will not engage one another, but will rather line up and you can turn the one front by turning the one in back hence the magnets cummulitave capability These same magnets are not attracted to one another if they are side by side, even if they are moving in opposite directions. We’ve already established that if they are moving in the same direction they are the same polarity.

Cummulitave, meaning more magnets, more power. To run in currents, there always has to be one current running in opposition to the other. This will be demonstrated in more detail later on. For now, take for instance the AA battery I used to charge the Perpetual Motion Holder. Each end of the battery has pushing power and when the circuit is complete they are allowed to run against each other where they attain pulling power along with their pushing power. This very interesting because the more tension between the two, the harder they work to move forward—because that is what they do—they want to move forward as fast as possible. By running against each other in opposite directions with a right hand twist their speed and power is increased. If the currents are running, moving against each other, spiraling in a anti-parallel double helical fashion, when the magnets get to the end of one another they must switch direction (polarity) so they can continue to move forward against each other with the right hand twist (see video below for clarification). This is AC or alternating current and the reason why currents are alternating in nature as Leedskalnin tells us. This is why direct current is actually alternating current when in a completed circuit, why it reads AC on the meters when you test the PMH, and this is how you use the PMH to transform Ed’s magnetic current (which is simply DC) into alternating current by running it through the PMH. Leedskalnin tells us this is how a transformer works. By putting two coils on the PMH and applying DC to only one of the coils, the output on the opposite coil is AC (please test this yourself). This is natural AC, what Leedskalnin describes as real life, and it has a unique sensation to the touch. The AC coming from the transformer outside of your house is AC before it hits the transformer so the poles inside transformer alternate. The PMH produces AC but its poles do not alternate. We've already begun to establish the inner workings of AC in nature, but to get a better understanding view the video below. Leedskalnin tells us that the action of natural AC is already taking place in the power lines before manmade AC is ran through them—that the power lines themselves are acting like generators.

He states: “Now about the generator, in the first place all currents are alternating. To get direct currents we have to use a commutator” (Magnetic Current). By using the copper wire in magnetic diffraction experiment is the easiest way to demonstrate how to commutate alternating currents into direct currents. Simply lay a piece of steel wire perpendicularly across the copper wire and again we will have direct currents, of course they are moving in opposite directions. We’ve already seen that the magnets are being thrown off the copper wire in opposite directions and we know they would much rather move forward in metal than in air. Leedskalnin concretizes this point further when he teaches us:

Individual magnets and magnetic currents permeate the universe. They weave the fabric that is the Aether connecting and building all things. And they are entropy. To accomplish this they will assimilate, interchange themselves if necessary, even yield to a stronger opposing magnet. This can be proven in many different ways as Leedskalnin teaches. The spring or helical shape allows the magnets and magnetic currents to compress (amperage--bigger wire, more amperage because of more magnets), expand or elongate (voltage--smaller wire, more voltage because of less magnets under more tension), vary in speed, etc. The helix shape also enables them to screw through anything. The characteristics of the magnetic interactions described herein correlate nicely with Modern EM terminology and most of the mathematics behind modern theory should easily apply.

4/5/2008 Update: The mathematics behind modern electromagnetic theory may have been originally intended to explain the dynamics postulated on this website. In his paper entitled, "The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field (An interpretation of Maxwell's 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force' parts I to III)", Frederick David Tombe, proposes an improvement to the understanding of Maxwell's paper by replacing the vortex cells sited in Maxwell's theory, with rotating electron positron dipoles, which bond together to form a double helical electromagnetic dynamic that is described in terms identical to what is demonstrated here (derived solely from the writings of Edward Leedskalnin and revealed by the magnetic diffraction experiment video above). Mr. Tombe has granted permission to make his theory available for download here, however by know means has verified or vetted anything presented on this website.

Mr. Tombe was formerly a physics instructor at, College of Technology Belfast, and Royal Belfast Academical Institution. His paper was originally submitted on February 15th, 2006, in the Philippine Islands. 18th December 2008 Amendment, Cebu City

The Double Helix Theory of the Magnetic Field

(An interpretation of Maxwell's 1861 paper 'On Physical Lines of Force' parts I to III) pdf.

The Individual Magnet VS. The Electron

Edward Leedskalnin never used the term double helix, and he certainly didn't use the term anti-parallel double helix when describing the interactions between these two currents made up of individual North and South Pole magnets. But he did give a vivid description, proved it in multiple ways with experimentation and showed people how to teach themselves.

Again, Ed Leedskalnin never did say anti-parallel double helix, but he did say this: he writes, “Magnetic current is the same as electric current is a wrong expression. Really it is not one current they are two currents, one current is composed of North Pole individual magnets in concentrated streams, and the other is composed of South Pole magnets in concentrated streams, and they are running one stream against the other stream in whirling, screw like fashion, and with high speed. One current alone if it be North Pole magnet current or South Pole magnet current it cannot run alone. To run one current will have to run against the other” (Magnetic Current).

Leedskalnin wrote these words 6 years before Rosalind Franklin realized the structure of DNA was in the shape of an anti-parallel double helix. He called his discovery the Cosmic Force, the force behind all life in the universe. This was 17 years before Crick, Watson, and Wilkins were awarded the Nobel Prize for the DNA model they made using Rosalind Franklin’s DNA diffraction pattern data. She died shortly after making her discovery and well before these guys were awarded the Noble Prize. She never knew her work ultimately would win the Noble Prize, but she probably did know that Oswald Avery had already shown that genetic characteristics could be transferred from one organism to another and that DNA was the vehicle of that transformation. And the genetic material. She may have considered that by unzipping or unraveling the DNA anti-parallel double helix that there would then be templates for two new helixes and considering what Leedskalnin teaches about what may be a more accurate atomic structure--having polarity and a common core--recognizing a correlation is effortless.

Ed Leedskalnin insists that the North and South Pole magnets are the building blocks—that they are so small they can pass through anything. But that doesn't mean their laws have to fall in the realm of quantum mechanics. X-ray diffraction reveals the true structure of the things. The magnetic diffraction experiment reveals the true structure of electricity. This magnetic diffraction experiment demonstrated in the video is DC current being alternated by hand with a switch, because this is essentially how we make manmade AC. Someone please correct me if I am wrong, but I believe Tesla already proved this concept. Those magnets are opposite in polarity all the way down that copper wire and clearly diffract equally. The means definitively that that the base of electricity is composed of two equal and opposite North and South pole magnetic forces—what is being thrown off of that wire in one direction has the opposite polarity of what is being thrown off in the opposite direction—it is undeniable. If I was able to flip that switch back and forth sixty times a second, how much do you think those hanging magnets would diffract?

Many experienced Leedskalnin researchers feel Ed sometimes gets a bit ornery with his wordplay. He writes,

His point it seems, however, is that all of humanity has been deceived because of the egos of men. Leedskalnin goes on to talk about how the electron came into existence and how it was invented. He explains in detail how the Thomson experiment was flawed. Ask yourself this: is there an experiment that exists today that can prove the existence of an electron?

When we talk about the electron, we are talking about something that is not considered small enough to even go through glass. Even a particle of sunlight can go through glass. If it can’t be small enough to go through glass, there is no possible way it can be a building block. Perhaps this absurdity gives Ed the right to poke fun at J.J.'s theory?

Leedskalnin tells us that the individual North and South pole magnets, combined with neutral particles of matter, are the three things in the universe needed to construct and deconstruct all of the elements—the perpetual transformation of matter. He also tells us that here on Earth, tomorrow's neutral particles of matter are today's sunlight.

Here is what Leedskalnin says about J.J. Thomson’s electron discovery and I would encourage everyone to do your own research on J.J. Leedskalnin explains:

The invention of an electron came by a tricky method in using electricity in a vacuum tube. Normally whether it be a generator or a batter, the positive terminal will have to be connected to the negative terminal, but in the vacuum tube two batteries with different strength were used, the smaller battery was connected normally, but the larger battery’s negative terminal was connected to the smaller battery’s negative terminal, and the positive terminal was left alone. That connection gave the negative terminal a double dose of strength, and so it became hotter and could push more. It was called cathode and the positive terminal anode, and the electricity that passed from the cathode to the anode was called electrons.

In case the inventor had used normally direct methods to find out what the electricity was he would have found out that the positive and negative electricity is equal in strength, and are running positive electricity against the negative electricity. That can be seen by connecting each of two pieces of soft iron wire with each terminal of a car battery. More sparks can be seen coming out of the positive terminal than from the negative terminal. This direct method is more reliable than the tricky method in the vacuum tube. The trouble with the physicists is they use indirect and ultra-indirect methods to come to their conclusions.

If the inventor of the electrons had a vacuum tube in which his electrons could run close to the top of the vacuum tube from the west side of the cathode to the east side of the anode and then would hand a vertically hanging magnet that is made from three-inch long hard steel fishing wire, and then hang one magnet pole at one time right on top in the middle of his stream of electrons, then he would have seen the north pole magnet swinging north, and the south pole magnet swinging south. The same thing will happen if the magnets are held above any wire where the electricity is running through. Those two vertically hanging magnets prove that the electricity is composed of two different and equal forces. Another way to prove this is to connect a flexible wire loop east end of the wire with positive battery’s terminal, west end with negative terminal, raise the loop one inch above the floor. Put U shape magnet on inch form loop, north pole south side of the loop. The north pole magnet will pull in the loop. Put the south pole magnet in the same place. It will push the loop away.

When an atom's cycle is over the things that are holding it together (magnets) go somewhere else to hold something else together and they are indestructible, although Leedskalnin does say--indestructible, in general. Nonetheless, perhaps the folks at CERN could find an alternative use for their atom smasher as these things seem to have characteristics very similar to memory metal.

Remember the PMH demonstration in the video with the helixes on the ring and that they were too long? When experimenting with the Perpetual Motion Holder it is easy to recognize the saturation point when charging the device with a larger battery or something like a 6 amp car charger. One wonders what something like a 100amp charge would do. Analyzing how the helixes interact when moving forward in opposition, it could be concluded that this creates an electrostatic state. And when either end of the current passes through the electrostatic state (and is again a single helix) it would then emit it's excess energy magnetically rather than what occurs in the electrostatic condition (when the opposite magnet is present and both are rotating at a much higher rate of speed). This concept may demonstrate the rotating magnetic/electrostatic field concept. View the video again and keep that perspective in mind--the correlation is natural.

The Perpetual Motion Holder demonstration may ultimately prove to be effective when discussing what Ed is describing above--radioactivity. The PMH, from the video demonstration, in it's current condition, is at it's absolute maximum capacity when the individual N and S pole currents are not yet in the electrostatic phase (double helical interaction state as described). Capacity must be prior to the double helical interaction phase and only in magnetic phase (prior to or after currents running in opposition) otherwise they are chasing the same kind of magnet (traveling in the same direction and thus having the same polarity). The absolute minimum capacity would be one individual North Pole magnet and one individual South Pole magnet because we've already established:

1. They always work to move forward with a right hand twist

2. Will work to move forward in opposition (perhaps because by running against each other they move forward with

more force and speed. The right hand twist may also aid in positioning for opposing alignment)

3. They would much rather work to move forward in metal than in air.

4. Given 1.,2.,3., when made to move forward in an orbit like that of the PMH they will do so indefinitely

Leedskalnin may also be telling us that radioactivity is a condition created when there is an extreme amount of heat and pressure that allows the circulating (in orbit around a common core) North and South pole magnets to fill up into a completely electrostatic state (complete double helical interaction). Consider the abovementioned description of the action taking place inside the transformer that is outside of your house. It could also be perceived that hard steel permanent magnets are made to have an abnormal condition not dissimilar to that of Leedskalnin's consideration of how Uranium was created. Although, considering Leedskalnin's explanation below of how permanent magnets are made, and considering the compressibility of the spring, aside from there being more room for more magnets there would then be added potential energy that is released in the form of expansion when forced out of the metal by incoming magnets.

Another thing, you have been wondering how a U shape permanent magnet can keep its normal strength indefinitely. You know the soft iron does not hold magnets, but you already have one that holds it. It is the perpeutual motion holder. It illustrates the principle how permanent magnets are made. All that has to be done is start the magnets to run in an orbit, then they will never stop. Hard steel U shape magnets have a broken orbit, but under proper conditions it is permanent. I think the structure of the metal is the answer. I have two U shape magnets. They look alike, but one is a little harder than the other. The harder one can lift three pounds more than the softer one. I have been tempering the other steel magnets, and have noticed that the harder the steel gets the smaller it becomes. That shows that the metal is more packed and has less holes in it so the magnets cannot pass through it in full speed, so they dam up in the prong ends. They come in faster than they can get out (Magnetic Current).

Gravitation must be caused by the matter in the middle of the earth, and more concentrated than Uranium. When Uranium atoms burst they release the North and South pole individual magnets that held the atom together, then the magnets scatter all around, they can only pass from the middle to the outside. When the North and South pole magnets are running alongside each other and in the same direction, they have no attraction for the other kind. They only attract if they are running one kind against the other kind. When the magnets are running out of the middle of the earth, as soon as they meet an object they attract it, on account of the fact that in any object there is both kinds of magnets in it. It can be seen by rubbing hard rubber or glass until they get hot., then they will attract sand, iron filings, salt, and other things. To see how it functions, move a salt crystal a little, if it happens to get on a different magnet pole, then it will jump away. Another way is to rub hard rubber until it gets hot, then it will be a temporary magnet. The difference between the rubber magnet and the steel magnet is both North and South poles are in the same side of the rubber and the magnet poles are small and there are many of them close together, but the surplus magnets in the circulating magnet that was put in it. Attract the iron filings with the rubber magnet, then approach with the steel magnet, Change the poles, then you will see some of the filings jump away. This means the steel magnet changed the magnet poles in the iron filings, and so they jumped away.

Theory of Anti-Parallel Double Helical Electromagnetic Interaction: North and South Pole individual magnets work to move forward with right hand twist.

Theory of Electromagnetic Polarity Interchange:

The polarity of the individual North and South Pole magnet is determined by the direction it is working to move forward

South Pole Individual Magnet ≈ Electron

North Pole Magnet ≈ Proton

South Pole Magnet = negative (-)

North Pole Magnet = positive (+)

Individual North and South Pole magnets must be in front of one another to be attracted to one another

Individual North and South Pole magnets must be moving towards one other to be attracted to one another

Individual North and South Pole magnets are not attracted to one another if they are moving in the same direction

Individual North and South Pole magnets are not attracted to one another if they are side by side

The natural path of the South Pole Magnets is to go up in the Northern Hemisphere

The natural path of the North Pole Magnets is to go up in the Southern Hemisphere

Cosmic Force

Here is additional information for those who read my advertisement in The Miami Daily News, February 3rd, 1946. The North and South pole individual magnets are the cosmic force. They are the building blocks of nature's perpetual transformation of matter, and they are so small that they can pass through everything,. They pass through the earth from pole to pole, and around the earth. If the North and South pole individual magnets could not pass through a vacuum tube the same as the Thomson's electrons cannot, then they could not be the building blocks. The Thomson electrons are very small parts of matter which come out of the cathode while the cathode is burned up or consumed in the vacuum tube. Without the general circulation of the building blocks there would be no change. Everything would remain the same way as it is now. The building blocks from a matter that go to pieces could not get in the general circulation for the new construction.

I think the Radium and Uranium were built up inside the earth with high pressure, and heat, while the North and South pole individual magnets were circulating through the earth. During the time the Radium and Uranium were inside the earth they absorbed more of the individual North and South pole magnets than they normally could hold, and so now while they are on top of the earth they let the magnets go so they can become normal again.

ATOMIC STRUCTURE

Aside from what has already been mentioned, the magnetic interaction proposed by this theory and based on Ed Leedskalnin’s detailed experimentation, effectively demonstrates how permanent magnets are made, which is the bonding mechanism for the PMH and the Earth; more importantly, and according to Leedskalnin, the atom as well. Leedskalnin tells us that like the Earth there has to be a common core for an atom to replicate itself whether animal, mineral or vegetable and also because these things are part of the Earth. This is another understanding Leedskalnin makes you work for. To realize how Leedskalnin is illustrating the common core concept, it is important to construct the PMH with square rod so that it can be turned 90 degrees and laid horizontally on one of the prongs without any coils and with the North Pole perpendicular to the ground. There are still 3 remaining faces on the top 6” bar that can be utilized to help illustrate the toroidal action of Leedskalnin's atomic structure and common core concept.

The above PMH arrangement demonstrates the common core concept (the bar in the middle is the common core) to aid in the understanding of the bonding mechanism and magnet flow for the Earth, Atom, Sun, Black Holes, and the perhaps even the Universe itself--essentially all things made up of matter. This contraption may also provide insight into the true electrodynamic structure of the atomic nucleus. The concept may seem simple, but coming to this understanding did take some time, which probalby can be attributed to Leedskalnin's cryptic writing style? When discussing the PMH's ability to act like a living thing Ed says, "It has little power but it could be made stronger by making bigger dimensions". From this, I can assure you two things: 1. He's not suggesting we make a giant PMH 2. Ed was a master at double entendre. For more of what Leedskalnin said that lead to this project click here.

Edward Leedskalnin's Perpetual Motion Holder (PMH). I originally began this project to demonstrate the possiblity of perpetual motion while studying at Purdue University in May of 2002.

Researchers have continued to be interested in the applications of this device because it defies natural laws of physics and is unexplainable by conventionally excepted electromagnetic theory. Modern science says it's impossible, but Edward Leedsklanin's theory says it's simple, natural, and that it works because there are some important aspects of modern science being taught in schools that are wrong.

Arguably more important than weather or not it can light a bulb forever, The Perpetual Motion Holder can act like a living thing. It's also is capable of depicting the atom and the earth because it operates on the principles of a theory with a sound base of understanding. Leedskalnin goes on to demonstrate J.J. Thomson's electron discovery experiment and also demonstrates how it's flawed. If it wasn't flawed the PMH would not work.

You know we receive an education in the schools from books. All those books that people became educated from twenty-five years ago, are wrong now, and those that are good now, will be wrong again twenty-five years from now. So if they are wrong then, they are also wrong now, and the one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is misled. All books that are written are wrong, the one who is not educated cannot write a book and the one who is educated, is really not educated but he is misled and the one who is misled cannot write a book which is correct.

The misleading began when our distant ancestors began to teach their descendants. You know they knew nothing but they passed their knowledge of nothing to the coming generations and it went so innocently that nobody noticed it. That is why we are not educated.

Now I will tell you what education is according to my reasoning. An educated person is one whose senses are refined. We are born as brutes, we remain and die as the same if we do not become polished. But all senses do not take polish. Some are to coarse to take it. The main base of education is one's "self-respect". Any one lacking self-respect cannot be educated. The main bases of self-respect is the willingness to learn, to do only the things that are good and right, to believe only in the things that can be proved, to possess appreciation and self control.

Now, if you lack willingness to learn, you will remain as a brute and if you do things that are not good and right, you will be a low person, and if you believe in things that cannot be proved, any feeble minded person can lead you, and if you lack appreciation, it takes away the incentive for good doing and if you lack self control you will never know the limit.

So all those lacking these characteristics in their makeup are not educated.

Ed Leedskalnin, 1936.

This is the way the North and South Pole individual magnets are running out of the coil's wire lengthwise. The reason the North and South pole individual magnets do not run across through the coils' wire as fast as they run in while in the coil is between the U shape magnet, the coil's wire is insulated, there is an air space around every wire and as it is known that the dry air is the best obstruction for the magnets to go through and as you know the coil is well insulated so the damp air does not get in. It is well known that it is many times easier for the magnets to run in metal than in air, now you see when the magnets run in the wire they hesitate to run out of the wire across the same way as they came in, so more of the new magnets are coming in the crosswise, then they can get out crosswise, so they get pushed out through the wire lengthwise. Now you know how the alternating magnetic currents are made.